Legal Opinion

State v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 19, 2004No. 02-1268PublishedCited by 168 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERNUS, Justice.

The defendant, Nathaniel Taylor, seeks further review of the court of appeals’ decision affirming his convictions for domestic abuse assault causing bodily injury and first-degree burglary. In addition to asserting various ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, he challenges certain evi-dentiary rulings by the trial court, the sufficiency of the evidence, and the district court’s refusal to grant a new trial on the assault and burglary charges. Although we concur in the court of appeals’ determination that the defendant’s convictions should be affirmed, we disagree slightly…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. People v. IllgenIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. United States v. Fred James Lemay, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by168 opinions

  1. State v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. State v. FountainSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. State v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  4. State of Iowa v. Kenneth Osborne ArySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  5. State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009

163 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API