Legal Opinion

People v. Escobar

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 14, 1991No. H008214PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AGLIANO, P. J.

—The issue in this appeal is whether conviction of violating Vehicle Code section 20001, commonly referred to as “hit and run,” may justify a restitution order requiring the defendant to pay for the injury caused by the underlying accident. As we shall explain, we conclude that conviction of such offense alone is legally insufficient to support such an order.

Facts

Appellant Jose Ayala Escobar was accused of violating Vehicle Code section 20001 1 (leaving the scene of an accident involving injury without fulfilling the requirements of sections 20003 and 20004), section 31…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. People v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. GoulartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. CornersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. JimenezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. People v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. People v. RUBICSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API