State v. Sanchez
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Defendant’s probation was revoked. The basis of the revocation consisted of laboratory tests indicating the presence of controlled substances in Defendant’s urine. We take this opportunity to institute a threshold test for determining the admissibility of laboratory tests used for purposes of probation revocation. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm in part, but reverse the trial court’s finding that the laboratory forms constituted sufficient evidence to support revocation of Defendant’s probation. We remand for a new hearing on the petition to revoke…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. HaddenhamNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
- United States v. Frank GrandlundCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- State v. HarrisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. MasseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. MaresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. LeonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. GuthrieNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Bruno R.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. PhillipsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. SimmonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2006
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.