Legal Opinion

Al-Najar v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 31, 2008No. 05-4448PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner Gamil Al-Najar appeals from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) opinion that Al-Najar failed to meet his burden of proof for establishing eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture, and holding that Al-Najar was eligible for removal due to a 2002 Michigan state conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Al-Najar argues that he is not subject to removal because his prior conviction did not in fact involve a controlled substance…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Gonzales v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. United States v. Oscar Paige, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  4. PICKERINGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
  5. Hisham D. Abu-Khaliel v. Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. THOMAS and THOMPSONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
  2. Garcia v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. AshrafCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  4. Barakat v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  5. Christian Duruji v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API