Al-Najar v. Mukasey
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Gamil Al-Najar appeals from a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) opinion that Al-Najar failed to meet his burden of proof for establishing eligibility for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture, and holding that Al-Najar was eligible for removal due to a 2002 Michigan state conviction for possession of a controlled substance. Al-Najar argues that he is not subject to removal because his prior conviction did not in fact involve a controlled substance…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Gonzales v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. Oscar Paige, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- PICKERINGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003
- Hisham D. Abu-Khaliel v. Alberto Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- THOMAS and THOMPSONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- Garcia v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. AshrafCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Barakat v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Christian Duruji v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.