Legal Opinion
THOMAS and THOMPSON
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2019No. ID 3966PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
27 I&N Dec. 674
(A.G. 2019) Interim Decision #3966 Matter of Michael Vernon THOMAS, Respondent Matter of Joseph Lloyd THOMPSON, Respondent Decided by Attorney General October 25, 2019 U.S. Department of Justice Office of the Attorney General (1) The tests set forth in Matter of Cota-Vargas, Matter of Song, and Matter of Estrada will no longer govern the effect of state-court orders that modify, clarify, or otherwise alter a criminal alien’s sentence. (2) Such state-court orders will be given effect for immigration purposes only if based on a procedural or substantive defect in the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pinho v. Atty Gen USACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Karastan Edwards v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- Alfredo Nicolas Talamantes-Enriquez v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Eduardo Velasquez-Rios v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Luis Ballinas-Lucero v. Merrick GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Peguero Vasquez v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.