Legal Opinion
Ametek, Inc. v. O'CONNOR
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 12, 1999No. 906, Sept. Term, 1996PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLANDER, Judge.
In this Workers’ Compensation Act case, we must determine how to calculate the credit due to an employer/insurer for benefits paid to a claimant prior to an increase in the claimant’s award that resulted from judicial review. The claimant urges that the credit must be commensurate with the total monetary benefits actually paid, while the employer/insurer contends that the credit must be based on the actual number of weeks for which benefits were paid. In real terms, $2,650.00 is at stake.
Susan O’Connor (the “Claimant”), appellee, filed a claim against her employer, Ametek,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mayor of Baltimore v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Philip Electronics North America v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Blevins v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Para v. Richards Group of Washington Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Branch v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ametek, Inc. v. O'ConnorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Uninsured Employers' Fund v. PennelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Del Marr v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Del Marr v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Anne Arundel County v. TierneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.