Legal Opinion

Ametek, Inc. v. O'Connor

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 10, 2001No. 63, Sept. Term, 1999PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

In Philip Electronics North America v. Wright, 348 Md. 209, 212, 703 A.2d 150, 151 (1997), in which the worker’s compensation award to a claimant was reduced on judicial review, this Court held proper, “a credit based upon the number of weeks the employer has paid benefits,” rather than one for the total amount of money paid to the claimant before the reduction of the original award. In a footnote, we observed:

“Philip Electronics also argues at length that affirming the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals would be detrimental to claimants if the reasoning of the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Baltimore Transit Co. v. State Rx Rel. SchrieferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  2. Mayor of Baltimore v. CassidyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Nelson v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. DeBusk v. Johns Hopkins HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Bethlehem-Sparrows Point Shipyard, Inc. v. DamasiewiczCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Mayor & City Council of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Harris v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. W.R. Grace & Co. v. SwedoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Del Marr v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Gleneagles, Inc. v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API