Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Lowell Kentz
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2001No. 00-50186PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
The main issue we must decide is whether the district court is foreclosed from enhancing a sentence for an offense committed on pretrial release when the defendant has not been specifically warned in the pretrial release order that committing a new offense while on release would result in an additional enhancement pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3147 and its implementing guideline, USSG § 2J1.7. 1
Charles Kentz, who was convicted on twenty-one counts of telemarketing fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 2326 and 3147, challenges his sentence primarily on the ground that he was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Castillo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- United States v. Gary William Minore, AKA Skip, United States of America v. Arthur Torsone, United States of America v. Prommateta ChinawatCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.