Legal Opinion
Pritchard v. Mercantile Trust Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 18, 1924No. Civ. No. 4532PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The trial court sustained demurrers of the defendants to the plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint and refused the plaintiff permission to further amend, and thereafter a judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.
In her complaint the plaintiff alleged that she and Fred G. King did, in the year 1892, enter into a partnership agreement. The business to be conducted by the partnership was that of dealing in mines and mining properties The plaintiff agreed to furnish moneys to the partnership from time to time, and the said Fred G. King agreed to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mares v. MaresMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Schoonover v. BirnbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Painter v. Estate PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Callanan v. Keeseville, Ausable Chasm, Lake Champlain RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1905
- McKay v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lyon v. MacQuarrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- ætna Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Baxter v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Link v. HaireMontana Supreme Court · 1928