Legal Opinion

Baxter v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1927No. Docket No. 5597PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from the judgment for defendant after order sustaining demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint. The demurrer, besides demurring generally, raised the statute of limitations by appropriate specifi cations. The complaint in many respects is like the one passed upon in Prichard v. Mercantile Trust Co. and King, 65 Cal. App. 327 [224 Pac. 103]. The defendant there was sued as administratrix, but here individually. The complaint alleges that plaintiff was a partner of Fred G-. King; that he conducted the partnership business in his own name from 1892 until the time of his death…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. V. P. Randolph & Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Hazelton v. LockeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  3. Larson v. DawsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1902
  4. Pritchard v. Mercantile Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Voris v. LampertCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  3. PCO, Inc. v. Christensen, Miller, Fink, Jacobs, Glaser, Weil & ShapiroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Ross v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
  5. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp. v. Littleton (In Re Littleton)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API