Phillips v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
1. The description of the stolen property (hogs) contained in the indictment was sufficiently definite under the provisions of our Code, § 26-2610. Brown v. State, 44 Ga. 300 (2) ; Rivers v. State, 57 Ga. 28; Alderman v. State, 57 Ga. 367; Harvey v. State, 121 Ga. 590 (49 S. E. *554674); Geiger v. State, 21 Ga. App. 75 (93 S. E. 1027); Garrett v. State, 21 Ga. App. 801 (95 S. E. 301); Knight v. State, 25 Ga. App. 765 (105 S. E. 55) ; Hixon v. State, 35 Ga. App. 392 (133 S. E. 285); Bone v. State, 120 Ga. 867 (48 S. E. 356).
Decided October 25, 1938. P. Z. Geer, for plaintiff in error.
2. The…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- McTyier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Merritt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
- Rouse v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951