Legal Opinion

Phillips v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1938No. 27111PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

1. The description of the stolen property (hogs) contained in the indictment was sufficiently definite under the provisions of our Code, § 26-2610. Brown v. State, 44 Ga. 300 (2) ; Rivers v. State, 57 Ga. 28; Alderman v. State, 57 Ga. 367; Harvey v. State, 121 Ga. 590 (49 S. E. *554674); Geiger v. State, 21 Ga. App. 75 (93 S. E. 1027); Garrett v. State, 21 Ga. App. 801 (95 S. E. 301); Knight v. State, 25 Ga. App. 765 (105 S. E. 55) ; Hixon v. State, 35 Ga. App. 392 (133 S. E. 285); Bone v. State, 120 Ga. 867 (48 S. E. 356).

Decided October 25, 1938. P. Z. Geer, for plaintiff in error.

2. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. McTyier v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  3. Merritt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Rouse v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Garrett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API