Legal Opinion
Dyersburg Suburban Consolidated Utility District v. The City of Dyersburg
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided June 29, 2007No. W2006-01704-COA-R3-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON APRIL 18, 2007 Session DYERSBURG SUBURBAN CONSOLIDATED UTILITY DISTRICT v. THE CITY OF DYERSBURG, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Dyer County No. 06C139 J. Steven Stafford, Chancellor No. W2006-01704-COA-R3-CV - Filed June 29, 2007 This appeal involves a dispute between a city and a rural water association as to which entity is entitled to provide water service to a proposed subdivision. The rural association has a defined service district in which it is empowered to provide water service, and most of the disputed property lies…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Byrd v. HallTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Anderson v. Standard Register Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Lexington-South Elkhorn Water District v. City of Wilmore, KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.