Legal Opinion
Hardin County Sav. Bank v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 3, 1946PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
This case is now before the court under section 148, Judicial Code, Title 28, U.S. C.A. § 254, on the merits of the conflicting claims of the Hardin County Savings Bank and the Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company to a balance of $Z8,655.12 due in whole or in part to one of these parties under a construction contract between one Ben B. Hogenson and the United States, acting through the Quartermaster Corps, U. S. Army, War Department. See Hardin County Savings Bank et al. v. United States, 102 Ct.Cl. 815.
The contract between Hogenson and the Government was dated June…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Martin v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Erwin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1969
- Trinity Universal Insurance Company and First National Bank in Dallas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- National Surety Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. Construcciones Werl, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.