Legal Opinion
The National Shawmut Bank of Boston v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided June 10, 1969No. 7260_1PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Circuit Judge.
In the summer of 1962, Anderson Bros., Inc., a general contractor, entered into three construction contracts with the United States Air Force for work at Otis Air Force Base in Massachusetts and Dow Air Force Base in Maine. As required by the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq., Anderson Bros., Inc. applied to the appellee (surety) for payment and performance bonds. Contained in the application for the bonds was an assignment to the surety “ * * * of earned monies that may be due or become due under said contract * * This assignment to the surety was not recorded under…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Pearlman v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Munsey Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- In Re E.R. Fegert, Inc., Debtor. Dan O'rourke, Trustee v. Seaboard Surety Company Coral Construction Company, Inc. Shotwell Paving CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Hemenway v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Canter v. SchlagerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
- Interfirst Bank Dallas, N.A. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- In re Modular Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.