Legal Opinion

Bazemore v. . Mountain

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Civil action tried before Robinson,-J., and a jury, at the Fall Term, 1896, of Bertie Superior Court. After the evidence was in, His Honor intimated that plaintiff could not recover upon his evidence and he, thereupon, submitted to a non-suit and appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtFurches, J.

This action is brought against the defendants W. E. Mountain and Patty W. Mountain, his wife, for supplies furnished one Spruill, a tenant of the feme defendant. The allegations of the plaintiff are that the defendant Patty is the owner in her own right of valuable real estate, consisting mainfy of farming lands upon which she has mules and farming implements suitable for its cultivation. That her husband is of no account, has no income and does not contribute anything.to the support of his wife and family. And they have no means of support except from the rents of the land of the feme…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Flaum v. Wallace Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Witz, Biedler & Co. v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gates v. . MaxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Whitley v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Roscoe v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. A. Brinkley & Co. v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Rawlings v. . NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API