Legal Opinion

Meacham v. Gjarde

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1938No. 26916. En BancPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

While riding in an automobile owned by defendant marital community and operated by defendant wife, plaintiff sustained injuries. To recover therefor, plaintiff brought this action on the theory that she and defendant wife were joint adventurers. Denying the material allegations of the complaint, defendants affirmatively alleged that plaintiff was riding in the automobile as an invited guest at the time of the accident which resulted in injury to plaintiff. Trial of the cause to a jury under proper instructions on the question of joint adventure resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Furman v. . FurmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Welsh v. . CochranNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  3. Hurley v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State v. ConstantineWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Bates v. TirkWashington Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carboneau v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Perren Ex Rel. Perren v. PressWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Manos v. JamesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Goodner v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Edwards v. WashkuhnWashington Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API