Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Bailey

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 23, 2012No. 09DO0156DS; A145725PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.

Wife appeals a dissolution judgment, arguing that the trial court erred in (1) awarding wife too little maintenance spousal support; (2) not requiring husband to maintain wife as a beneficiary on his whole life insurance policy until his spousal support obligation is fulfilled; and (3) dividing the parties’ property in a manner that was not just and proper in all the circumstances. Because the notice of appeal in this case was filed after the effective date of the 2009 amendments to ORS 19.415(3), we have discretion whether to review the facts de novo. However, neither party has sought de…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In re the Marriage of CullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. In re the Marriage of PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. In re the Marriage of KahleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. In re the Marriage of AndersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Matter of Marriage of ColtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  4. In re the Marriage of TilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. In Re the Marriage of WolfeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API