Legal Opinion

Broadway v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 1952No. 8 Div. 89PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

The accused was convicted of keeping a gambling table. Title 14, Sec. 265, Code 1940.

*544The defendant did not testify in the case nor introduce any witnesses in his behalf.

During the argument to the jury the solicitor made this statement: “Mr. Smith criticizes our witnesses in this case, but Mr. Smith has not given us any witnesses to criticize.”

We are confronted with the task of determining whether or not this was a comment on the defendant’s failure to testify.

At common law the defendant in a criminal case was not a competent witness in his own behalf. This seemed to be…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  3. Broadway v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  4. Kilpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Curlette v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Way v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Thompson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Welch v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Southerland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API