Broadway v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
In this case the Court of Appeals reversed a judgment of conviction in the circuit court whereby appellant was charged with keeping a gaming table under Title 14, section 255 of the Code.
The opinion of the Court of Appeals shows that the defendant did not testify in the case or introduce any witnesses, and that during the argument to the jury the solicitor made the following statement: “Mr. Smith criticizes our witness in this case, but Mr. Smith has not given us any witness to criticize.” We presume Mr. Smith, there referred to, was the attorney for defendant in the trial of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Ex Parte FosheeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Kilpatrick v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Sisk v. CargileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902
- Everage v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- Trafficante v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.