Legal Opinion
Gainesville Utilities Department v. Florida Power Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 24, 1971No. 464PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brennan
Under the Federal Power Act, an order of the Federal Power Commission that directs one electric utility “to establish physical connection of its transmission facilities with the facilities of” another utility “may prescribe the terms and conditions of the arrangement to be made . . . including the apportionment of cost between them and the compensation or reimbursement reasonably due to any of them.” Federal Power Act §202 (b), 49 Stat. 848, 16 U. S. C. § 824a (b). The Commission order which directed respondent Florida Power Corp. to interconnect its electric system with that of petitioner…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schaffer Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Florida Power Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
3Cited by29 opinions
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Federal Power Commission v. Florida Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Federal Power Commission, Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Petition of Green Mountain Power CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1973
- Gainesville Utilities Department and City of Gainesville, Florida, Plaintiffs v. Florida Power and Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.