Legal Opinion
City of Pueblo v. Ratliff
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided June 16, 1958No. 18122PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutton
Plaintiffs in error were defendants below and defendant in error was plaintiff. We will refer to defendant in error as “plaintiff” or “Ratliff,” to the City of Pueblo as “Pueblo” or “City” and to Maclndoe Plumbing and-Heating, Inc., a corporation, as “Maclndoe.” John *470M. Maclndoe, dba John M. Maclndoe Plumbing and Heating, was dismissed as a party by the trial court and no error is assigned thereto.
Plaintiff sought to recover damages for alleged injuries to his neck which injuries he claimed resulted from the negligence of defendants on January 12, 1953 (a Monday) at about 9:00 A.M. when he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Riss & Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
- Carr v. BoydSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Clark v. HicksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Edwards v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
- Thomas v. DunneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kistler v. HalseySupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- United Telecommunications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. American Television and Communications Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Brooks v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- People v. MulliganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Franklin Supply Company, Etc. v. Albert W. Tolman, Jr. And Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.