Legal Opinion
Franklin Supply Company, Etc. v. Albert W. Tolman, Jr. And Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Company, Etc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 7, 1972No. 24989PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TRASK, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from a judgment awarding damages to plaintiff below, Franklin Supply Company, from Peat, Mar-wick, Mitchell & Co., an international certified public accounting firm and defendant below, based upon multiple claims of negligence and misrepresentation; fraud; breach of contract; and fraudulent conspiracy in performing an audit. Also named as a defendant was Albert W. Tolman, a citizen of Texas, representing a class of persons known as Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
The action was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- James v. PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Naton v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Allen Realty Corp. v. HolbertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1984
- Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Delos v. Farmers Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- The Honorable Karen Weldin Stewart, CIR-ML, Insurance Commissioner v. Wilmington Trust SP Services, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.