Legal Opinion
Bernstein v. United States Department of State
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 15, 1996No. C-95-0582 MHPPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PATEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff Daniel Bernstein brought this action against the Department of State and the individually named defendants seeking declaratory and injunctive relief from their enforcement of the Arms Export Control Act (“AECA”), 22 U.S.C. § 2778, and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (“ITAR”), 22 C.F.R. §§ 120-30 (1994), on the grounds that they are unconstitutional on their face and as applied to plaintiff. Now before this court is defendants’ motion to dismiss for lack of justiciability. 1
Having considered the parties’ arguments and submissions, and for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. CorleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Universal City Studios, Inc. v. ReimerdesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- United States v. Elcom Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2002
- 321 Studios v. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studios, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Bernstein v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.