Legal Opinion
Leopoldstadt, Inc. v. Commissioner of the Division of Health Care Finance & Policy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 11, 2002PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCordy, J.
The plaintiffs, Leopoldstadt, Inc., doing business as Favorite Nurses; the American Staffing Association (ASA); and the Massachusetts Association of Nursing Agencies (MANA), all provide, or work with providers of, temporary nursing personnel to medical facilities.3 These providers of temporary nursing personnel are referred to interchangeably as temporary nursing agencies (TNAs), or nursing pools. The plaintiffs filed a complaint in the county court seeking declaratory and injunctive relief regarding the Commonwealth’s setting of the maximum hourly rates that TNAs are permitted to charge to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- First National Bank in St. Louis v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Purity Supreme, Inc. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MontecalvoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Cleary v. Cardullo's, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Christensen v. Kingston School CommitteeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Town of Middleborough v. Housing Appeals CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Commonwealth v. GillisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
- Board of Appeals v. Housing Appeals CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Kain v. Department of Environmental ProtectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.