Legal Opinion
Bennett v. New Jersey
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 19, 1985No. 83-2064PublishedCited by 210 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor
The issue presented is whether substantive provisions of the 1978 Amendments to Title I of the Elementary and Sec*634ondary Education Act apply retroactively for determining if Title I funds were misused during the years 1970-1972. This case was previously before the Court, and we then held that the Federal Government may recover misused funds from States that provided assurances that federal grants would be spent only on eligible programs. Bell v. New Jersey, 461 U. S. 773 (1983). We expressly declined, however, to address the retroactive effect of substantive provisions of the 1978 Amendments.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Schooner PeggySupreme Court of the United States · 1801
- United States v. Security Industrial BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Greene v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Geneva Butts v. The City of New York Department of Housing Preservation and DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brian P. Moore v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Karnas v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.