Legal Opinion

City of Newark, New Jersey v. United States Department of Labor

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 29, 1993No. 92-3489PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GARTH, Circuit Judge:

The City of Newark petitions this court to review and reverse the final decision of the Secretary of Labor, ordering the City to repay to the Department of Labor $780,557 in funds previously granted under the Comprehensive Employment and Training of Act of 1973. Because we reject Newark’s contention that the Secretary is statutorily barred from recouping the funds, and because substantial evidence supported the Secretary’s determination that Newark failed to comply with the pertinent reporting and documentation requirements, we will affirm the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of Maine, Office of Maine Ceta v. The United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. City of Camden, New Jersey v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Oakland County Board of Commissioners v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  4. Inland Manpower Association, a California Public Entity Exercising Joint Powers v. United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mayer v. GottheinerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
  2. Evans v. Chichester School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Petrochko v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County2010
  4. United States v. TorresDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Conquistador v. CookDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API