Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Heartland Oil & Gas, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 25, 1991No. 65,605PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

LOCKETT, J.:

This was an action brought by eight plaintiffs, five of whom were not residents of Kansas, to recover the purchase monies paid for units in an Oklahoma oil and gas well and to rescind certain agreements executed in Colorado. Plaintiffs claimed they were fraudulently induced to enter into the agreements by nonresident officers of the Kansas corporation. At the conclusion of the trial, the trial court instructed the jury on an additional theory of fraud not raised in the plaintiffs’ petition or at pretrial, i.e., fraudulent promise of future…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Ling v. Jan's LiquorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  3. Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L. E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe and Thomas J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  4. Woodring v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  5. Ammon Ex Rel. Ammon v. KaplowDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  2. Deprenyl Animal Health, Inc. v. The University of Toronto Innovations FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. Doe v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  4. Karstetter v. Voss, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006
  5. Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API