Legal Opinion

Sagerson v. Nathan Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1924No. Appeal, 12PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Some time prior to 1860, the owner of a tract of land, then forming part of the borough, now the City of Johns-town, prepared and recorded a plan of the property, showing its division into lots fronting on plotted streets and alleys. Among the latter was Ebbert Alley, which, by an ordinance of the borough, dated July 27, 1860, was lengthened and declared to be a public highway. The parties agree that thereafter it had to be kept perpetually open for the use of the public. The Nathan Realty Company, one of the defendants (hereinafter called the defendant), is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mint Realty Co. v. WanamakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  2. City of Philadelphia's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1875
  3. Volk v. VolkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cain v. Aspinwall-Delafield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. National Accident & Insurance v. Workmen's Circle Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Borough of Summerhill v. SherbineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Philadelphia Tapestry Mills, Inc. v. Philadelphia Storage Battery Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API