Legal Opinion
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided October 28, 2003No. C.A.02-359-MPTPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
THYNGE, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This is a patent infringement case involving technology in the aviation industry. Plaintiffs, Honeywell International Inc. and Honeywell Intellectual Properties Inc. (“Honeywell”), 1 filed suit alleging infringement 2 of five patents (U.S. Patent Nos. 5,839,080 (“the ’080 patent”), 6,219,592 (“the ’592 patent”), 6,122,570 (“the ’570 patent”), 6,138,060 (“the ’060 patent”), and 6,092,009 (“the ’009 patent”)) against defendants, Universal Avionics Systems Corp. (“Universal”) 3 and Sandel Avionics (“Sandel”). 4
On July 30, 2003,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Honeywell International Inc. v. Universal Avionics Systems Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- nCube Corp. v. SeaChange International, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2011
- Cruz-Vargas Alicea v. Continental Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020