McMahon v. City of Middletown
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtDiPENTIMA, C.J.
*69 The plaintiff, Patrick T. McMahon, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered *70 in favor of the defendant city *60 of Middletown (city). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court contravened General Statutes § 52-178 2 by denying his counsel's 3 requests to ask leading questions during the direct examination of the city's mayor, former mayor, and former acting deputy police chief. We decline to review this unpreserved claim and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant. In October, 2007, the plaintiff was hired by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Burnham v. Karl & Gelb, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. MunozSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- State v. DabkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dechellis v. DechellisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Gartrell v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Clinton v. AspinwallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020