Legal Opinion

Gartrell v. City of Hartford

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 12, 2018No. AC39687PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.

The plaintiffs, Joseph Gartrell, 481 Albany Avenue, and Wonder Package, LLC, appeal from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion for a directed verdict in favor of the defendant city of Hartford (city). 1 The plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the city on the basis of the jury's answer to a single interrogatory. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts and procedural history are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiffs owned a mixed-use commercial and residential building located at 481 Albany Avenue in Hartford (building).…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. West Haven Sound Development Corp. v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Vaccaro v. Shell Beach Condominium, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  4. Guzman v. YerozConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
  5. Mokonnen v. Pro Park, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Guddo v. GuddoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  2. Guiliano v. Jefferson Radiology, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API