Legal Opinion
Donley v. City of Colorado Springs
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided August 9, 1941No. 280PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SYMES, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, residents of Colorado are, according to the stipulation of facts, members of Jehovah’s Witnesses, duly authorized representatives of the Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society, Inc., under whose direction “each performed and performs the work of preaching the gospel of the kingdom of Almighty God, under Christ Jesus, in Colorado Springs and other parts of Colorado and the United States”.
They bring this suit as individuals, and in and on behalf of all similarly situated, known as Jehovah’s Witnesses, in the said City of Colorado Springs, Colorado.
The defendant,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Town of Green River v. Fuller Brush Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Watchtower Bible & Tract Society of New York, Inc. v. LewisohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Tate v. AkersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Tate v. AkersDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1976
- Brown v. City of StillwaterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.