Legal Opinion

Tate v. Akers

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided November 23, 1977No. 76-1418PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

The precise question in this- appeal is whether a Seventh Day Adventist “literature evangelist,” sometimes referred to as a “colporteur,” is a “solicitor,” “peddler,” “hawker,” or “itinerant merchant,” as those *1168terms are used in the City of Laramie’s version of the so-called Green River Ordinance. The trial court, after trial of the matter and after having heard testimony as to the nature of a colporteur’s work, found, and concluded, that a colporteur was neither a solicitor, a peddler, a hawker, nor an itinerant merchant, and accordingly held that the Laramie…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Shreveport v. TeagueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
  2. Donley v. City of Colorado SpringsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1941
  3. Tate v. AkersDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LinaresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Love v. Mayor, City of Cheyenne, Wyo.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1978
  3. Weissman v. City of Alamogordo, NMDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1979
  4. Proctor v. General Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  5. Tate v. AkersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API