Tate v. Akers
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
The precise question in this- appeal is whether a Seventh Day Adventist “literature evangelist,” sometimes referred to as a “colporteur,” is a “solicitor,” “peddler,” “hawker,” or “itinerant merchant,” as those *1168terms are used in the City of Laramie’s version of the so-called Green River Ordinance. The trial court, after trial of the matter and after having heard testimony as to the nature of a colporteur’s work, found, and concluded, that a colporteur was neither a solicitor, a peddler, a hawker, nor an itinerant merchant, and accordingly held that the Laramie…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Shreveport v. TeagueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Donley v. City of Colorado SpringsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1941
- Tate v. AkersDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1976
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LinaresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Love v. Mayor, City of Cheyenne, Wyo.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1978
- Weissman v. City of Alamogordo, NMDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1979
- Proctor v. General Conference of Seventh-Day AdventistsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
- Tate v. AkersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977