Legal Opinion
Tate v. Akers
District Court, D. Wyoming
Decided February 25, 1976No. C75-147PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BRIMMER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Bob Tate and Jerry Higgs, brought this class action on be half of themselves and others similarly situated, pursuant to Rule 23(a)(3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking a declaratory judgment under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sections 2201 and 2202, with jurisdiction being founded upon 28 U.S.C. Section 1343.
Plaintiffs Tate and Higgs are members of the Seventh Day Adventist Church. They wish to engage in a campaign of “literature evangelism” in the City of Laramie, Wyoming, during which the plaintiffs and others will go from…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Martin v. City of StruthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Drake v. Cheyenne Newspapers, Inc.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1994
- Love v. Mayor, City of Cheyenne, Wyo.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1978
- Tate v. AkersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Weissman v. City of Alamogordo, NMDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1979
- Tate v. AkersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977