Legal Opinion
Medasys Acquisition Corp. v. SDMS, P.C.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 10, 2002No. CV-02-0045-PRPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERCH, Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether a party’s election of the equitable remedy of rescission automatically precludes it from also receiving an award of punitive damages. We conclude that it does not.
BACKGROUND
¶2 In January 1998, SDMS, a medical practice, contracted to purchase computer-assisted diagnostic nuclear imaging equipment from Medasys Acquisition Corporation. The contract required that SDMS trade in its old diagnostic imaging equipment and make a down payment of $10,900. SDMS was to pay the balance of $98,100 in three installments after Medasys installed the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Linthicum v. Nationwide Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Jennings v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Black v. GardnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Village of Peck v. DenisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Desert Palm Surgical Group, P.L.C. v. PettaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Security Title Agency, Inc. v. PopeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Prancing Antelope I, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company Chris Shannon and Cynthia G. Bloomquist v. Saratoga Inn Overlook Homeowners Association, Inc., a Wyoming nonprofit corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Kobar Ex Rel Kobar v. Novartis Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.