Legal Opinion
Dachman v. Shalala
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 13, 1999No. Civil AMD 96-873PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Sarah Rebecca Dachman, M.D., an Orthodox Jew and a former employee of the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), an agency of the Department of Health & Human Services, instituted this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (“Title VII”). Her claims include one or more of the following theories: sex discrimination, race discrimination, religious discrimination, retaliation and hostile environment. 1 As redress, Dr. Dachman seeks declaratory, injunctive and various forms of corrective relief and damages.
In…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. RileyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- Blount v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- Pueschel v. VenemanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Dachman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Miller v. RunyonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.