Legal Opinion

Dachman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 4, 2006No. 05-772CPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HORN, Judge.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Plaintiff, Sarah R. Dachman, a medical doctor, is a former employee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), an agency in the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). In July, 1988, plaintiff began employment with the defendant and signed her first “Agreement to Receive an Allowance Under the Federal Physicians Comparability Allowance [PCA] Program,” pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 5948 (2000).1 Beginning in July, 1994, and continuing until Dr. Daehman’s removal from the FDA, plaintiff and her employer had disagreements regarding her time, attendance and…

2Cases cited151 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Hall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API