Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 4, 1996No. 95 C 5303PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION, AND ORDER

ASPEN, Chief Judge:

■ In June 1992, a jury found Defendant Larry Martin guilty of conspiring to possess narcotics with the intent tó distribute, 21 U.S.C. § 846. Martin now moves pro se under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction and sentence, arguing that a civil forfeiture default judgment entered against his house imposed punishment upon him under the Double Jeopardy Clause and thus barred his criminal conviction. For the reasons set forth below, we deny the motion.

I. Background

On June 13, 1991, Martin was charged in one count of a multi-count,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt James Wren Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Renato TorresCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt, James Wren, Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Larry A. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API