Legal Opinion

United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt, James Wren, Payback Mines, Claimants-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 30, 1995No. 93-55947PublishedCited by 129 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed September 6, 1994, 33 F.3d 1210, is amended as follows:

*42On 33 F.3d at 1220, please add the following footnote at the end of the text and renumber the footnotes accordingly:

Our adoption of this categorical approach is also compelled by the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Department of Revenue of Montana v. Kurth Ranch, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 1937, 128 L.Ed.2d 767 (1994). There, the Supreme Court applied Austin’s categorical approach for determining when punishment has been imposed in a Double Jeopardy case arising pursuant to a state statute that taxed drug monies. Id. at…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt James Wren Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

3Cited by129 opinions

  1. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Alexander A. Artway v. The Attorney General of the State of New Jersey Chief of Police of Woodbridge Township, New Jersey the Superintendent of the New Jersey State Police Attorney General of New Jersey and Superintendent of the New Jersey State Police, in No. 95-5157. Alexander A. Artway v. The Attorney General of the State of New Jersey Chief of Police of Woodbridge Township, New Jersey the Superintendent of New Jersey State Police Chief of Police of Woodbridge Township, New Jersey in No. 95-5194. Alexander A. Artway v. The Attorney General of the State of New Jersey Chief of Police of Woodbridge Township, New Jersey the Superintendent of New Jersey State Police Alexander A. Artway, in No. 95-5195Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. State v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pedro Arias HERNANDEZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States v. Frank L. BairdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API