Legal Opinion

Schnupp v. Blair Pharmacy, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 27, 2025No. 1:17-cv-02335Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND UNITED STATES ex rel. TIMOTHY SCHNUPP, Relator, v. Civil No. ELH-17-2335 BLAIR PHARMACY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In this qui tam1 action, filed on August 15, 2017, the Relator, Timothy Schnupp, has sued his former employer, Blair Pharmacy, Inc. (“BPI,” “Blair Pharmacy,” or “Pharmacy”), and its owner, Matthew Blair (“Mr. Blair”) (collectively, “Blair”), pursuant to the False Claims Act (“FCA” or the “Act”),

31 U.S.C. §§ 3728

et seq. See ECF 1 (“Complaint”). BPI was, at the relevant time, a compounding pharmacy.2…

2Cases cited107 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API