Legal Opinion

Long v. Brusco Tug & Barge, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2016No. 90976-8PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 Brian Long appeals the denial of his motion for a new trial based on a claim of juror misconduct. The question before us is whether the juror declarations Long submitted in support of his motion describe actual misconduct by jurors or instead reveal matters that inhere in the verdict. We conclude the declarations expose the jury’s deliberative process behind closed doors and cannot be considered to impeach the verdict. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court and the Court of Appeals’ conclusion that Long is not entitled to a new trial.

*130FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 Long sued his former…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adkins v. ALUMINUM COMPANY OF AM.Washington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Cox v. Charles Wright Academy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. BalisokWashington Supreme Court · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BerheWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Personal Restraint Petition Of Michael Emeric MockovakCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  3. Aloncita Monroe, App/x-resp. v. City Of Seattle, Resp./x-app.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. In re Pers. Restraint of LuiWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Rebekah L. Hart v. Emily PratherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API