Legal Opinion

Personal Restraint Petition Of Michael Emeric Mockovak

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 6, 2016No. 69390-5-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, C.J.

¶1 — To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must show that his counsel’s performance fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and that the deficiency prejudiced him. In 2011, a jury convicted Michael Mockovak of attempted first degree murder, solicitation to commit first degree murder, first degree theft, and conspiracy to commit first degree theft. We affirmed the convictions on direct appeal. Mockovak subsequently filed this personal restraint petition, contending that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to support his entrapment defense with expert…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State of Washington v. Leslie Melgar MorenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API