Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Devonshire v. SUPER. CT. FOR KING CTY.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 1967No. 38897PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hamilton, J. —

A writ of certiorari brings here for review an order of public use and necessity. The order was entered in an eminent domain proceeding initiated by the city of Seattle as a result of its acquisition of an interest in the monorail system constructed in connection with the Century 21 Exposition of 1962.

The background facts can be briefly stated. In 1961, the city of Seattle, by appropriate action, authorized Alweg International, Inc., Century 21 Exposition, Inc., and Howard S. Wright, a construction contractor, to construct, operate, and maintain an elevated monorail transit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. WelckerWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Polson Logging Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. City of Seattle v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  5. State Ex Rel. Henry v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Des Moines v. HemenwayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Central Puget Sound Regional Transit Authority v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. CharltonWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Cent. Puget Sound Reg'l Transit Auth. v. WR-Sri 120th N. LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API