Legal Opinion
Baer, Timberlake, Coulson & Cates, P.C. v. Warren
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided August 13, 2010No. 106,212PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WM. C. HETHERINGTON, JR., Judge.
T1 Rahmana Warren appeals a judgment in favor of attorneys Baer, Timberlake, Coul-son & Cates, P.C., arguing Baer was not a holder of note and should not be allowed to recover when a mistake in a payoff amount used in closing documents was caused by its own calculation error. The judgment of the trial court is supported by competent evidence and is not affected by an abuse of discretion or error of law. Consequently, the trial court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
12 "Issues of law are reviewable by a de novo standard. An appellate court claims for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State v. ElmoreWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Brown v. NicholsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- K & H Well Service, Inc. v. Tcina, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Fent v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- PUMMILL v. HANCOCK EXPLORATION LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2018
- BAER, TIMBERLAKE, COULSON & CATES v. WarrenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2010