Legal Opinion
United States v. Tucker
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided November 19, 1986No. CR 84-AR-104-NEPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
This Opinion is an addendum to the Memorandum Opinions of July 27, 1984, 591 F.Supp. 1257 (N.D.Ala.1984), July 14, 1986 and Sept. 8, 1986, 644 F.Supp. 1165 (N.D.Ala.1986), September 18, 1986, 643 F.Supp. 1067 (N.D.Ala.1986), October 17, 1986, 646 F.Supp. 843 (N.D.Ala.1986), and November 7, 1986, 646 F.Supp. 1543 (N.D.Ala.1986), all written after United States v. Handley, 763 F.2d 1401 (11th Cir.1985). In its previous opinions this court has found and reiterated on new evidence that Mr. Dees’ “sole purpose” in prosecuting CV-80-HN-1449-S was to discover…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Ernesto FernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. HandleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. HandleyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1984
- United States v. TuckerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1986
- United States v. HandleyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Lenwood Lewis White, United States of America v. Terry Joe Tucker, United States of America v. William Johnny Mason, Roger David Handley, David Lee Kelso, and Ray Winford Steele, United States of America v. William David Riccio, United States of America v. Ricky Lynn Creekmore, United States of America v. David Lee KelsoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988