Legal Opinion
United States v. Handley
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided July 27, 1984No. CR-84-AR-104-NEPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ACKER, District Judge.
Seven of the nine defendants in the above entitled cause have moved to suppress as evidence the depositions and other fruits of discovery in Southern Christian Leadership Conference, etc., et al. v. The Invisible Empire, Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, etc., et al., Civil Action No. CV-80-HM-1449-S, formerly entitled The People’s Association of Decatur, et al., v. The Invisible Empire, etc., et al. The Court has conducted a hearing and has received evidence bearing on the issues raised in the said motions. Pursuant to Rule 12(e), Federal Rules of Criminal…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. HandleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- State v. CrossmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1996
- United States v. HandleyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.