Legal Opinion
United States v. Ernesto Fernandez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided January 30, 1986No. 85-5031PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Per curiam
Ernesto Fernandez challenges the validity of his narcotics convictions. He contends that the district court committed reversible error when it failed to exclude certain testimony as a sanction for the prosecutor’s failure to comply with a dis covery order. 1 For the following reasons, we remand the ease to the district court for a full development of the facts and reconsideration.
I
On September 25, 1985, Ernesto Fernandez was indicted, in four counts, for knowingly and intentionally possessing cocaine, with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1981), for knowingly and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Fred "Freddy Campo" Campagnuolo, John "Jackie Campo" Campagnuolo, and Michael "Mike Douglas" GougulesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Sam Salvatore Sarcinelli and Pamela Sue MessinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. George BurkhalterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Wayne Lewis CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. IvyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. PevetoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Jack C. TurnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.