McFadden v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
The Controlled Substance Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 (Analogue Act) identifies a category of substances substantially similar to those listed on the federal controlled substance schedules, 21 U.S.C. § 802 (32)(A), and then instructs courts to treat those analogues, if intended for human consumption, as controlled substances listed on schedule I for purposes of federal law, § 813. The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in turn makes it unlawful knowingly to manufacture, distribute, or possess with intent to distribute controlled substances. § 841(a)(1). The question presented in this case…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by180 opinions
- Joan Kedra v. Richard SchroeterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Matthew JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2023
- United States v. CoombsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.