Legal Opinion
Lorber v. Eskof Real Estate, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Irwin Shapiro, J.
This is an action by plaintiffs, subcontractors, against the defendant Pumo, the general contractor, who has defaulted, against the defendant Eskof Real Estate, Inc., the owner, and against the defendants Samuelson and Shapiro, the lessees, to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed against the owner’s property, and for a personal judgment against Pumo and the lessees.
The defendants Samuelson and Shapiro, hereinafter called the lessees, contracted with the defendant Pumo to supply labor and material to fit the subject premises as a delicatessen store and restaurant. The lessees agreed to pay Pumo…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Herrmann & Grace v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Herrmann Grace v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Brainard v. . County of KingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- P. Delany & Co. v. DuvouNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Szemko v. WeinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Falco Construction Corp. v. P & F Trucking, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Baldwin Kitchen Cabinet Corp. v. ArtzNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- East Hills Metro, Inc. v. J.M. Dennis Construction Corp.New York Supreme Court · 2000
- Mid-Island Lumber & Supply Co. v. LoeningNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- Rure Associates, Inc. v. DiNardi Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.