Legal Opinion

Underwood v. Otwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1967No. 606PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

In his complaint, plaintiff has stated a cause of action for a judgment on the note which defendants Otwell executed to him and to defendant Underwood, and he has attempted to state a cause for the foreclosure of the deed of trust securing the note. “A creditor whose debt is secured by way of mortgage or trust has two remedies — one in personam, for his debt; the other in rem, to subject the mortgaged property to its payment; and a resort to one is no waiver of the other.” Silvey v. Axley, 118 N.C. 959, 963, 23 S.E. 933, 934. The creditor may combine the two remedies in one civil action. G.S.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Shoe v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Abegg v. HirstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  3. Credle v. . AyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  4. Bass v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. Coulbourn v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Booker v. EverhartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Jamestown Terminal Elevator, Inc. v. KnoppNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Trustees of the Garden of Prayer Baptist Church v. Geraldco Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API